There was a time when, in order to be
invited to join a UK partnership, the
prerequisites were good lawyering
skills, a long tenure at the firm and to be
seen as a ‘good egg’ by the other partners.
An aspiration for partnership was assumed
and firms ran themselves profitably with
minimal management intervention. This
model was founded in a world with no price
competition, minimal client pressure and
limited requirements for efficient operations.
Indeed, with time expended as the
basis for charging, it could be argued that
the regime positively mitigated against
efficiency improvements in lawyering, since
no economic benefit was delivered. There
were, of course, initiatives to reduce costs
in order to boost profits, but the overriding
focus was not necessarily on reducing
prices to the client or delivering valueadded
services.
Today, a highly competitive market,
more demanding clients and new market
entrants all mean that laws firm must
evolve to be a different sort of business
and that partners need multifaceted skill
sets in order to succeed. Whilst being a
good lawyer is necessary, it is no longer
sufficient. The role of the partner is broader
and will continue to broaden as legal
services are increasingly viewed by clients
as ‘just another thing I buy’, with service
performance being measured and value
benchmarked across a wide range of factors and firms.
Investing in skills
It is, of course, easy to say that partners
now need to be accomplished client work
winners, relationship developers, project
managers, coaches, mentors, team leaders,
financial wizards and operational innovators.
Walking this talk is somewhat more
challenging!
To an extent, this is because firms
do not invest in developing skills on the
basis of the lifecycle of the lawyer from
trainee onwards. To build for the future, it
is critical to craft an end-to-end strategy for
legal, management and interpersonal skills
development.
By putting in place the building blocks
during the early years of a lawyer’s career,
exposing associates to management
challenges and responsibilities early on
rather than seeing their role as simple timerecording
machines, the skills that will be
needed to build business resilience and
allow for succession will be created.
Simply promoting the best time
recorders and then expecting them to
undergo an overnight transformation to
become rounded businesspeople and client
advisors is delusional. It should be clear
that the skills required for the future need
to be built today on solid foundations.
Playing to strengths
Also important to consider are individual
strengths and weaknesses as part of
building a rounded and balanced partner
team. It is implausible to expect every
partner to be equally competent across
all aspects of the ‘ideal partner’ job
description; there will be natural strengths
and weaknesses. It seems more sensible,
therefore, to create a set of core (and
minimum) skills and behaviours for all
partners and to then focus on tasking
individuals to pursue excellence in the
areas which play to their strengths.
It follows that different partners will
make contributions to the firm’s success
which will vary in value, and so may
command a different level of reward. Taking
a soccer metaphor, the goalkeeper may have a lower market value than the centre
forward, but good players are needed in
both positions for the team as a whole to
succeed. It would be perverse to measure
the goalkeeper on his ability as an outfield
player and the striker as a shot-stopper
(and to encourage them to invest time
in becoming better at these non-core
activities), yet this is just what a one-sizefits-
all approach to partner performance
management does.
In developing a model that is fair and
transparent, but which does not pretend
that all contributions are necessarily of
equal value, it is important to engage in
a mature and open conversation with
partners. The progressive firm, in finding
ways to allow individual partners to play
to their strengths (within the context of
the firm’s overall business structure and
objectives), also rewards them accordingly.
Eye on the future
To succeed in the future, partners will
need skills that are simply not part of
standard legal education; firms must
act early and decisively to fill this void if
they are to have a partnership which is
able to build a dynamic, sustainable and
successful business.
Some may argue this investment may
be wasted if people ultimately pursue
careers elsewhere. Consider the following
an apocryphal conversation between two
senior executives discussing the value of
investing in training and development for
their people. “What happens if we spend
all that money developing our people
and they leave?” laments one. “What
happens if we don’t and they stay?”
retorts the other.
Invest now to secure your firm’s
long-term future.